The argument over the use of the bathroom by transgender
students would seem to be absurd on the surface and without merit to some who
embrace more progressive, thoughtful and critical views. Yet there is a deeper
issue which compels the cultural and political battle lines drawn. I remember working at my local Target store here
in Emeryville, CA some years ago, where a situation arose when the only bathrooms
available were the women’s bathroom and a bathroom where the parents could clean
and change their baby’s diapers, etc. What
was interesting about the matter is that men having a choice to use the women’s
bathroom, and/or the baby changing bathroom preferred to stand in physical
stress and pain waiting the men’s restroom to open. It was astounding as seemingly mature,
thoughtful adults, chose to get physically stressed, some visibly in pain as
they waited for the men’s restroom to open.
For many, arguments over the use of the bathroom, between good,
well intentioned and thoughtful people on all sides, are framed as concerns for
parental rights, prevention, safety and privacy within a discourse on what is moral based on sensitivities
affirmed by conservative or progressive interpretations of biblical scripture
and a social order rooted in historical desires of sexism, racism and patriarchy.
The bathroom issue presents a profound moral crisis as it echoes, at least for
this writer, actions exemplified by the election in 2008 and 2012 of Barack
Obama, the first African American, as President of the United States, the
legalization of gay marriage, women’s rights, immigration, economic and
cultural globalization, the war on terror, the decline and the gradual demise of
the white working class as a significant voice in the U.S. cultural, economic and
political arenas. The world no longer revolves around the exclusivity of
desires, interpretations, imaginations and affirmations of white society and
culture.
Despite political situations unjust, alternative facts, divisive
rhetoric, and the supposed deconstruction of the progressive, administrative
state, as stated by Steve Bannon, senior advisor to the President of the United
States at CPAC, a conservative political action convention, the U.S. is experiencing
a fundamental sociocultural shift in its social order, this will not be stopped. The use of bathrooms by transgender students
is just the tip of the iceberg. The bathroom
issue is not so much about prevention, safety or privacy, but a means to
address the reality that American society is moving beyond traditional notions
of a social order based on the desires of white society and culture, its imagination,
and its privilege as gained through genocide, enslavement, disregard for
treaties, and various forms of oppression. The reaction to this shift has resulted
in the election of a white alpha male daily proving he is unfit to be
president, the attack on a free press, the burning of Mosques, bomb threats of
Jewish Community Centers, millions of immigrants at risk of deportation, and
the desecration of Jewish cemeteries, to name a few.
Rescinding the rules, contrary to Title IX, on the use of bathrooms by transgender
students is just one more shot of intervention by those who fight for a more traditional
social order against the inevitable progress of a liberal progressive agenda. That
said, writing as one who is African American, transgender a woman and
progressive, I suggest that agendas emerge from those intimate authentic spaces
of being and therefore whatever intervention of religion, politics, law
enforcement, cultural or social discourses engaged are primarily confronting
questions of authenticity and how to live out that authenticity daily in the face
of oppression and in some cases repression. June Jordan, author of Civil Wars.
Touchstone, 1981, writes, Intervention
has its limits. The limits of intervention, particularly when it comes to
matters of civil rights and social justice, conjure images of Bull Conner,
water hoses and his dogs, Church Bombings, and Jim Crow, as those who stubbornly
held on to a social order that had long past. Their intervention for the sake
of a social order based on racism and the affirmation of whiteness eventually
led to their shame.
Considering Black History Month, the question for this
writer in addition to whether a transgender student can use the bathroom of
their choice is a moral one. Is the intervention by those seeking to protect or
at least, shore up a social order in transition moral? Is there moral
credibility to their argument? The many successes of the civil rights movement including
the election of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United
States makes it clear that the morality of the argument is crucial in attaining
the justice of Micah 6:8 and a peace within unhindered by injustice.
He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the Lord require of you
but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?
and what does the Lord require of you
but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?
In closing, the use of the bathroom by transgender students must be seen within the larger context of a culture war of moral consequence at least for now being prosecuted by the local community upon the Trump administration rescinding rules regarding transgender students use of bathroom in schools and the supreme court. In this sense the bathroom issue is at the vanguard of a human rights, liberal progressive political agenda and must be defended at all cost not just for itself but for the liberation of the soul from regimes of ignorance and oppression and the freedom to be at peace within.